
“…but first, a little ru-ru!”
Illegitimate SCOTUS Justice and noted Witch-Finder Sammy Alito is pissed off that someone else got to announce his ruling taking away women’s rights:
The leak last spring before the court eliminated the nationwide right to abortion was a “grave betrayal of trust by somebody, and it was a shock,” he said. The threat to the justices, he added, was not theoretical because it “gave people a rational reason to think they could prevent that from happening by killing one of us.”
“He ruined, ruined everything for me,” Alito whined. “I was looking forward to hearing the gasps first!,” he didn’t sob. “Will no one think about ME?”
He sees himself as a Snidely Whiplash kind of guy. He wanted to be the one to announce the new cruelty from the government. You know, soak up some wailing and gnashing of teeth like the old-timey judges in the bible. No sympathy for him here.
w3ski
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not Snidely Whiplash…Torquemada.
LikeLiked by 5 people
Check the tags and you will see: “Torquemada of Trenton.”
Rgds,
TG
LikeLiked by 4 people
Honestly I don’t pay attention to the tags as I should, but GMTA! (Great Minds or Gutter Minds, Dealers choice …we are scissorheads, after all 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
…
Whu… Is he making suggestions?
He’s supposed to be some kind of judge or something. He’s got to be playing to the crowd, right? Since this suggestion would not be in his best interest.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The drama queen is great in this one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Scammy Scalito is also really bad at math. Rational people can count, and know TWO of the just-us-es would have to go to make enough difference.
LikeLike
His shitty opinion was a grave betrayal and a shock. The short version is “women are in the Constitution, so fuck them bitches.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Women are “not” in the constitution.
I erred on that first comment🙄
LikeLiked by 1 person
So, am I to understand that, according to master of logic Slick Sammy, during the period following his leak it would have been “rational” to have wanted to kill one of the Supremes?
Just curious. Perhaps I lack his sophist understanding.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s what I was seeing!
From the moment the leak happened to the moment it was made official there was a chance it wasn’t yet officially in writing, he’s saying, apparently. I don’t know how the opinions are done in reality, but the rational part seems to be thinking that it could stop the opinion becoming final instead of just a leak if a couple of the yeahs (yays) on this didn’t get a chance to sign.
LikeLike
By “assassination threats” he means that time Boofer had to skip dessert at the steakhouse.
What would Sammy have done if people conspired to kidnap him like Gov. Whitmer? He’d be hiding in the closet where they keep the spare robes.
LikeLike