UPDATED: Science Proves The Press Has Been Negative On Joe Biden

The beatings will continue until the press quits writing stories about Democrats in Disarray.

Guys, it is NOT your imagination: our Failed Political Press ™ has been more negative on President Handsome Joe Biden that it has been on the twice-impeached insurrectionist Hair Füror.

Artificial intelligence can now measure the negativity with precision. At my request, Forge.ai, a data analytics unit of the information company FiscalNote, combed through more than 200,000 articles — tens of millions of words — from 65 news websites (newspapers, network and cable news, political publications, news wires and more) to do a “sentiment analysis” of coverage. Using algorithms that give weight to certain adjectives based on their placement in the story, it rated the coverage Biden received in the first 11 months of 2021 and the coverage President Donald Trump got in the first 11 months of 2020.

The findings, painstakingly assembled by FiscalNote vice president Bill Frischling, confirmed my fear: My colleagues in the media are serving as accessories to the murder of democracy.

After a honeymoon of slightly positive coverage in the first three months of the year, Biden’s press for the past four months has been as bad as — and for a time worse than — the coverage Trump received for the same four months of 2020.

And then the WaPo does something extraordinary, something that only us lowly bloggers ever do: they put that conclusion in context:

Think about that. In 2020, Trump presided over a worst-in-world pandemic response that caused hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths; held a superspreader event at the White House and got covid19 himself; praised QAnon adherents; embraced violent white supremacists; waged a racist campaign against Black Lives Matter demonstrators; attempted to discredit mail-in voting; and refused to accept his defeat in a free and fair election, leading eventually to the violence of Jan. 6 and causing tens of millions to accept the “big lie,” the worst of more than 30,000 he told in office.

And yet Trump got press coverage as favorable as, or better than, Biden is getting today. Sure, Biden has had his troubles, with the delta variant, Afghanistan and inflation. But the economy is rebounding impressively, he has signed major legislation, and he has restored some measure of decency, calm and respect for democratic institutions.

So who are you gonna believe, your lying eyes (and the WaPo) or Fox News and Wingnuttia?

We need a skeptical, independent press. But how about being partisans for democracy? The country is in an existential struggle between self-governance and an authoritarian alternative. And we in the news media, collectively, have given equal, if not slightly more favorable, treatment to the authoritarians…

…Too many journalists are caught in a mindless neutrality between democracy and its saboteurs, between fact and fiction. It’s time to take a stand.

If you want a real shocker, that opinion piece was authored by the ol’ Dick-Whisperer hisself, Dana Milbank.

UPDATE 1: Milbank updated it with a link to the data.

This entry was posted in Hair Führer Donald Trump, Our Failed Political Press, President Handsome Joe Biden, WaPo. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to UPDATED: Science Proves The Press Has Been Negative On Joe Biden

  1. roket says:

    Also too, this opinion piece has about as much chance of survival as a republican autopsy.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. ali redford says:

    Oh, boy. I love(d) Norah O’Donnell, but CBS is on this bandwagon with such enthusiasm they make me gag. It’s as if they read MPS and Press Run, then use you guys as an instruction manual. It hasn’t been neutral since ol’ Buchanan got “liberal media” started, but now it is just brazenly anti-Dem president.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Ok, where is the real Dana Milbank?

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.