The FBI Had An Insider At The Stupid Coup

Well this is an interesting development (emphasis mine):

“As scores of Proud Boys made their way, chanting and shouting, toward the Capitol on Jan. 6, one member of the far-right group was busy texting a real-time account of the march.

“The recipient was his FBI handler.”

“In the middle of an unfolding melee that shook a pillar of American democracy — the peaceful transfer of power — the bureau had an informant in the crowd, providing an inside glimpse of the action… In the informant’s version of events, the Proud Boys, famous for their street fights, were largely following a pro-Trump mob consumed by a herd mentality rather than carrying out any type of preplanned attack.”

I’m kinda dubious about this. The accounts I read said that the Proud Boys got to the Capitol and peeled off, which sounds like a command and control center, while they let the mouth breathers then ran amok. It’s not like a disciplined attack with well-trained personnel and strategic plans. But what I don’t understand at all is that if they had a live informant, why didn’t they alert anyone to send in reinforcements?

Of course EVERYONE with a Twitter was watching it unfold in real time, so maybe this is not as egregious as it sounds?


This entry was posted in Insurrection, Nazis, Proud Boys, The Stupid Coup. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The FBI Had An Insider At The Stupid Coup

  1. genelms says:

    The whole narrative, to me, sounds contrived. However if true I would posit that the failure to raise the alarm by the FBI handler would be best explained that he was more an enabler than a handler. There is no doubt in my mind, that the FBI has about the same percentage of fascists as the military.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. MinuteMan says:

    while they let the mouth breathers then ran amok.

    In chess the pawns go first — Magneto

    Liked by 1 person

  3. spotthedog says:

    I’m fine with anything that makes them more suspicious of the guy next to them.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. lofgren says:

    This is like when a guy goes to visit his ex-wife because they just had an argument, and he’s feeling a bit concerned about her, and it would be best if they smooth things over with a real life conversation, but he goes ahead and tosses the tarps, hacksaw, duck tape, and hand gun in the back of the van for totally unrelated reasons.

    He didn’t mean to kill her. It certainly wasn’t planned. He just got carried away.

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.