Quid Meets Quo, Goes Pro (Joe Manchin, Cont.)

“For ME?!”
Joe Manchin’s demands must be met!

The trash panda of the Senate, Joe Manchin gets his bipartisan talking points from the Wingnuttian US Chamber of Commerce:

In a new column published in the Charleston Gazette-Mail, Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) announced his opposition to the For The People Act, a bill that would protect voting rights nationwide. His arguments echo talking points released in April by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Republican-alligned trade association that recently backed his reelection campaign.

And the article goes on to point out a number of coinkydinks where Manchin’s verbiage aligns with the Chamber’s wurds (is too a wurd!). And that kiddies is pay-to-play in action.

While the argument crafted by the Chamber and adopted by Manchin is designed to seem centrist and reasonable, it has the same practical effect as opposing all federal legislation to protect voting rights. Why? Because there do not appear to be ten Republicans that will support any federal law to protect voting rights.

Manchin’s position underscores the centrality of the Chamber in undermining efforts to protect voting rights. The Chamber’s aggressive lobbying campaign to defeat federal voting legislation is being underwritten by America’s most prominent corporations — including many that publicly claim to be champions of voting rights.

I’m shocked.

The next section is the part that gets underreported and needs more amplification. Should you speak with your Facebook rage uncle, putting process over substance is probably one of his pet peeves, and yet, there’s Manchin:

One remarkable aspect of Manchin’s column announcing his opposition to the For The People Act is that it does not contain one substantive criticism of the For The People Act.

Manchin notes that the For The People Act is “sweeping,” 800 pages, and has “garnered zero Republican support.” But the For The People Act has a lot of specific provisions. Does Manchin oppose automatic voter registration? Or a 15-day early voting period? Or vote-by-mail? Or non-partisan redistricting?

Manchin doesn’t say. His objections focus exclusively on process and ignore substance.

And that’s really where our Failed Political Press ™ should be focused: what is the provision that has the Coup Klux Klan and Manchin’s panties in a knot?

They won’t go there. The DRAMA! of one lone man bringing the US democracy to a halt is much better for clicks and likes than showing how this alleged fight for bipartisan principles has nothing to do with bipartisanship (or democratic principles, for that matter).

Related: The W$J  (emphasis mine)-

“Senate Democrats said they were considering changes to their election overhaul proposal, after pivotal centrist Sen. Joe Manchin made clear he opposed both the current bill and any imminent move to weaken Republicans’ power to block legislation.”

“Mr. Manchin promised to share a list of provisions that he would find acceptable.”

“The pledge came after Democrats complained that Mr. Manchin had declined to specify what changes he wanted.”

Watch that space.

This entry was posted in Bastards, Joe Manchin, Vote Suppression, voting. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Quid Meets Quo, Goes Pro (Joe Manchin, Cont.)

  1. Martin Pollard says:

    Ah, well. Rest in peace, US democracy. It was a good thing while it lasted. As Jefferson Davis said of the Confederacy (and yes, I get the irony), the epitaph on the Union’s gravestone should be, “Died of a theory.”

    Liked by 1 person

  2. roket says:

    Meanwhile, our local CofC is on the verge of bankruptcy. Entrepreneurs have no use for it and that is where our local economy is going.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. RWW says:

    When did the Connecticut for Lieberman Party open up a branch in West Virginia?

    Liked by 1 person

  4. osirisopto says:

    OK, it’s time for Manchin to reveal his price.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. MDavis says:

    What was that about Koch? He says he made a mistake by promoting partisan hostility? And now his Americans for Prosperity group is promoting even MORE partisanship? And Manchin is parroting all of their lines?
    Yeah, that hypocrite.
    It wasn’t me, it was the one-issue PAC!


Comments are closed.