Ah, Texas!

Enemy of the People, Prznint Stupid twatted this:

And what is this Texas Case, you ask? We turn to our pals at Electoral-Vote to ‘splain to us:

In a move that can only be described as way beyond Hail Mary, Texas AG Ken Paxton has filed a lawsuit directly with the Supreme Court asking it to invalidate the election results in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, just coincidentally four states that Joe Biden won and which the respective secretaries of state have already certified.

Paul Smith, a professor at Georgetown University’s Law School and an election-law expert said: “There is no possible way that the state of Texas has standing to complain about how other states counted the votes and how they are about to cast their electoral votes.” In other words, Texas is going to have to make a case about how Texas is damaged by how other states voted. The relief that Texas is asking for is to throw out all the 20 million votes in the four states. Texas is also asking the Supreme Court to push back the date on which the electors vote (Dec. 14), even though that date is set by federal law and only Congress can change it. Paxton’s hope is simply that the justices ignore the law and the Constitution and just do what the party of the president who appointed them wants.

My brain hurts. Texas truly is the National Lab for Bad Policy. Do continue.

Needless to say, the justices are not eager to catch this hot potato (see above). The Supreme Court has repeatedly made it clear that it does not want original jurisdiction on cases other than those involving a foreign country or those arising from disputes between the states. By framing the case as “Texas doesn’t like the way Pennsylvania runs its elections” Paxton is trying to make it a dispute between the states. That’s not what the folks who wrote the Constitution meant by “disputes between the states.” A more typical case is California suing Arizona for diverting all the water in the Colorado River for local use so that none of it reaches California. In this case, California is definitely damaged by Arizona claiming “all the water is ours.”

If the Court accepts this case, we expect Pennsylvania will sue Texas on the grounds that it doesn’t like Texas’ gun laws. Once states are granted the right to sue other states because they don’t like the other states’ laws, there will be no end to the suits. The Court is likely to refuse to touch the case and possibly note in the rejection that if there are election disputes, it is up to Congress to settle them. The buck stops over there somewhere.

This should be a fun one to watch today. The House wages 5,000 Quatloos that the Electoral-Vote guys got this on the nose.

This entry was posted in 2020 Goat Rodeo, Crazeee States, Texas, America's Lab for Bad Policy. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Ah, Texas!

  1. sos says:

    I wonder how Gov Paxton feels about a taint punt.

    But I won’t have to wonder very long.

    It’s just a flare to make sure LDN remembers him in his Xmas pardon spree.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. I’m putting my quatloos on the notion that this is just a ‘Please Pardon Me, for I did this thing to massage your mushroom-shaped, err ego’ letter from the indicted (and accused of more crimes by his own staff) Paxton.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. ming says:

    Christ its this asshole again.
    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/gunnison-.county-texas-attorney-general_n_5e908f1bc5b6cac1e812b97e

    He sued us because of a stay at home order that prevented ultra-rich second home owners from traveling to our county during the height of the pandemic in March. They think we don’t notice their bug-out compounds nestled in the forest and valleys around town. We do and when it comes time to eat the rich, I plan on dining locally. Good thing I’ve been stockpiling ketchup to cover up the taste of entitled assholes.

    Liked by 4 people

  4. Buttermilk Sky says:

    States’ rights, anyone? Since when does Texas get to tell Pennsylvania how to organize its elections?
    Many states changed their voting laws because of the Trumpandemic. Why just these four? Oh, wait, I think I can guess.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Heim says:

    Ken Paxton took the course in Deflection 101?

    Liked by 1 person

  6. roket says:

    Sad. All their spaghetti has ended up on the floor.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. spotthedog says:

    A few years ago Oklahoma and Nebraska tried to challenge Colorado’s legalization of marijuana, that was shot down by Supreme Court, so I think there is all kinds of precedent already set. But yeah, Paxton is putting on a show.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Green Eagle says:

    Two comments: First of all, the Constitution provides for the Supreme Court deciding conflicts between the States. This is an attempt to circumvent the entire Judicial system and go directly to the Supreme Court, where the hope is that the six Republican Justices will ignore the law and put Trump back in the White House. Second, I want to agree with a comment made above. This guy is under indictment for serious Federal securities fraud that could net him decades in prison. He is betting that if he plays into Trump’s delusions hard enough, he will get a pardon.

    Liked by 4 people

  9. Karla says:

    And Floriduh and 16 additional states have signed on with Paxton.
    Again, I apologize on behalf of my state.

    Liked by 2 people

    • ali redford says:

      Yeah, me, too… our AG joined, as well, stating constitutional questions that must be answered. I don’t think our guy is in trouble with the law, though.

      Liked by 1 person

  10. Bruce388 says:

    “Our Country needs a victory!” We got one when the election was declared on November 7th.

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.