The FAA has cleared Boeing’s 737 Max to resume flights, 20 months after grounding it following two fatal crashes, and you know, about 100,000 years before anyone will agree to be strapped into one, ever.
Search
Snip!
Recent Comments
Pharmakeus Ubik on The Stupid Coup, Part Deu… tengrain on The First Shady Makes Her… roket on The First Shady Makes Her… Meremark on The First Shady Makes Her… julesmomcat on The Stupid Coup, Part Deu… Snip!
Tweet, Twit, Twat
My TweetsSnip!
Blogroll
- A List Apart
- Alcademics
- All Hat and No Cattle
- All Kinds of Stuff
- All the way from Oy to Vey
- AlterNet
- American Drink
- An Earth-bound Misfit
- Art of Drink
- Badtux, the Snarky Penguin
- Balloon Juice
- Big, Bad, Bald, Bastard
- BLCKGRD
- BlogDog
- Blue Gal
- Booze Business
- Brand New
- BuzzFlash
- Cockeyed
- Common Dreams
- Comrade Kevin’s Chrestomathy
- d r i f t g l a s s
- Demeur
- Empire of the Senseless
- Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting
- Free Speech Radio News
- Gastropoda
- Girls Like Blue Too
- Hackwhackers
- Herlander-Walking
- Hill’s Country
- His Vorpal Sword
- How Much Do You Know
- Hysterical Raisins
- Idle Hands Department
- In These Times
- Independent Media Center
- Intrepid Flame
- Journeys with Jood
- Ladies United for the Preservation of Endangered Cocktails
- Last Exit Before Hooterville
- Mad Kane’s Political Madness
- Mallard Fillmore’s Bathtub
- Media Alliance
- Media Crashers
- Media Needle
- Mike Flugennock: Political Cartoons
- My Ready Room
- No More Mister Nice Blog
- Notions Capital
- Once Upon a Paradigm
- Opinion Emporium
- padre mickey’s dance party
- Politicians are Poody Heads
- Politics Plus
- Progressive Radio
- PSFK
- Pygalgia
- Ramona’s Voices
- Rants from the Rookery
- Riddled
- Scarabus
- Spirits and Cocktails
- Squatlo’s Rant
- Stinque
- Stonekettle Station
- Strangely Blogged
- The Adventures of Baron vonBeavis
- The Bar Keep
- The Big Empty
- The Cocktail Chronicles
- The Cocktail Guru
- The Coffee Messiah
- The Friendly Atheist
- The Galloping Beaver
- The Great Consolidation
- The Momfessions
- The Progressive
- The Public Intellectual
- The Rant by Tom Degan
- The Rectification of Names
- The Wisdom of the West
- There will be bread
- This Modern World
- TruthOut
- Unsolicited Opinion
- Urantian Sojourn
- Vagabond Scholar
- Web of Evil
- Welcome Back to Pottersville
- Wisdom of the West
- Yikes!
- You Might Notice A Trend
- Zaius Nation
Snip!
Archives
Snip!
Translate MPS
Snip!
Electoral Vote
A very long time ago, I was a SSGT 43151E crew chief on KC-135A. To get there, I had to pass a Specialty Knowledge Test (SKT). The main reason I made SSGT in the minimum time-in-grade was I ACED that SKT! One of the questions was:
Question: Why are the engines located below and forward of the wings?
Answer: To prevent wing flutter and STALL.
Flash forward to today…The new engines on the 737 are too large to fit below and in front of the wings, They would conflict with the aircraft height when it’s on the ground. I’m not an engineer, but I can see the problem. The belief the new computer software will make the plane’s flight controls safe is like religious belief.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Eeehh…the issue really wasn’t with the engine placement or computer systems…the Air Force has been flying aircraft that are inherently unstable and HAVE to be controlled by computer for a long time now; and pretty much all modern aircraft are fly-by-wire, which means the pilot tells the computer what he wants the aircraft to do and the computer tells the aircraft.
The 737Max fiasco didn’t really have anything to do with the engine placement or the additional control software to account for that, but that the anti-stall system was poorly designed (It depended on a single sensor for airspeed) and they DID NOT TELL THE AIRCREWS ABOUT THIS NEW SYSTEM. The training for this was am added-cost option. The aircraft was literally fighting the aircrews until the last moment; in both of the fatal crashes crew members were frantically going through the manuals to figure out WHAT THE HELL WAS GOING ON.
The system as designed should have never survived it’s first engineering review when it was just some paper, let alone get into production.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh, yea. I am so sure that is safe to use. They have been so forthcoming with accurate news and descriptions, and so out front of the problem to begin with that I have total confidence in what they say.
NOT.
w3ski
LikeLiked by 1 person
Let’s all make it a bleeding heart liberal issue to get the 737 grounded permanently. Maybe the RWNJ’s will insist on flying it in.
LikeLiked by 3 people
O –
I like the way you think.
Rgds,
TG
LikeLiked by 1 person
As the old saying goes, “It’s a disaster waiting to happen.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Or … It’s a disaster that has happened twice. Now it’s looking for you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Boeing Starliner test… ’nuff said. Boeing sold their engineering soul to the beancounters when they merged with McDonnell-Douglas.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-space-exploration-boeing/boeings-botched-starliner-test-flirted-with-catastrophic-failure-nasa-panel-idUSKBN20106A
LikeLiked by 1 person