One Lump of Stupid or Two, M-U-R-K-O-W-S-K-I?

Murkowski said WHAT?

Murkowski said WHAT?

Lisa Murkowski, the Alaskastan senator who taught us all how to spell her name in her literal proxy fight with Mooselini, now teaches us how Justices are appointed to the court:

“I do believe that [a SCOTUS] nominee should get a hearing,” Murkowski told reporters Wednesday at a question-and-answer session in Juneau, which followed an annual speech to the state Legislature.

Very good, Senator. Do continue.

“That doesn’t necessarily mean that that ends up in a vote. The purpose of the hearing is to determine whether or not this individual, based on their record … should be named to the highest court in the land.”

A hearing and no vote? King Solomon would be proud of how you split that baby, Murkowski.

This entry was posted in supreme court, Wingnuttia. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to One Lump of Stupid or Two, M-U-R-K-O-W-S-K-I?

  1. RobGinChicago says:

    Fortunately, Murkowski is being challenged for her senate seat by a very capable candidate running as an “independent”, Margaret Stock. I’ve known Ms. Stock for several years, and she would be a magnificent alternative to Ms. Murkowski. http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/immigration/2016/02/immigration-law-prof-and-attorney-margaret-stock-to-run-for-us-senate.html

    Like

  2. roket says:

    Interpreting the Constitution is just like interpreting the Bible. Pick out what you like and throw away the rest.

    Like

  3. Big Bad Bald Bastard says:

    Just to troll everyone, President Obama should nominate Sarah Palin for Justice of the SCOTUS.

    Like

  4. Split that baby? Hell, she expertly cut that fucker up like a fryer chicken.

    Like

Comments are closed.