One Lump of Stupid or Two, M-U-R-K-O-W-S-K-I?

Posted on February 18, 2016 by

Murkowski said WHAT?

Murkowski said WHAT?

Lisa Murkowski, the Alaskastan senator who taught us all how to spell her name in her literal proxy fight with Mooselini, now teaches us how Justices are appointed to the court:

“I do believe that [a SCOTUS] nominee should get a hearing,” Murkowski told reporters Wednesday at a question-and-answer session in Juneau, which followed an annual speech to the state Legislature.

Very good, Senator. Do continue.

“That doesn’t necessarily mean that that ends up in a vote. The purpose of the hearing is to determine whether or not this individual, based on their record … should be named to the highest court in the land.”

A hearing and no vote? King Solomon would be proud of how you split that baby, Murkowski.

This entry was posted in supreme court, Wingnuttia. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to One Lump of Stupid or Two, M-U-R-K-O-W-S-K-I?

  1. RobGinChicago says:
    February 18, 2016 at 8:42 am

    Fortunately, Murkowski is being challenged for her senate seat by a very capable candidate running as an “independent”, Margaret Stock. I’ve known Ms. Stock for several years, and she would be a magnificent alternative to Ms. Murkowski. http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/immigration/2016/02/immigration-law-prof-and-attorney-margaret-stock-to-run-for-us-senate.html

    Like

  2. roket says:
    February 18, 2016 at 9:02 am

    Interpreting the Constitution is just like interpreting the Bible. Pick out what you like and throw away the rest.

    Like

  3. Big Bad Bald Bastard says:
    February 18, 2016 at 9:54 am

    Just to troll everyone, President Obama should nominate Sarah Palin for Justice of the SCOTUS.

    Like

  4. brucedesertrat says:
    February 18, 2016 at 12:07 pm

    Split that baby? Hell, she expertly cut that fucker up like a fryer chicken.

    Like

Comments are closed.