Jennifer Rubin then and now, now and then

I generally try to stay away from Jen, I find her brand of pit bull attacks to be lazy, cheap, and sleazy, but today she starts trying to rehab herself following the spectacular implosion of The Willard Mechanism, for whom she carried water lo these many months:

Until October [Willard's campaign] was the Perils of Pauline campaign. It moved in fits and starts on foreign policy. The message was rarely consistent from day to day. Gobs of ads were aired to no apparent effect. The convention speech was a huge missed opportunity. Romney made a lunge now and then in the direction of immigration reform and an alternative health-care plan without giving those topics the attention they deserved. The communications team was the worst of any presidential campaign I have ever seen — slow and plodding, never able to capitalize on openings. It was hostile, indifferent and unhelpful to media, conservative and mainstream alike.

Matters did improve once Ed Gillespie moved forward to take charge of the message. A message at least became discernible. The ads certainly were simpler, more direct and more attuned to making a case for Romney’s agenda. But if not for a stunning series of performances in the debates and unexpected eloquence on the stump in the last month, Romney almost surely would have done worse than he did. A presidential race needs more than a good month to be successful.

Now, of course, all of this flies in the face of what she has previously written, and Media Matters breaks it down for us:

Rubin now: “The convention speech was a huge missed opportunity.”

Rubin then: “Mitt Romney accepted the nomination of his party for president with a speech that showed he can rise to an occasion, and let us see a side of him that was compelling and heartbreaking.” [Right Turn, 8/30]

Rubin now: “Romney made a lunge now and then in the direction of immigration reform and an alternative health-care plan without giving those topics the attention they deserved.”

Rubin then: “The media are doing their best to disguise the unpleasant fact that Mitt Romney has been more forthcoming on immigration than the president has in more than three years in office.” [Right Turn, 6/24] “This isn’t that hard: Romney will repeal Obamacare. He has always favored protection for people with preexisting conditions who move from one employer-provided plan to another or from an individual-purchased to an employer-provided plan.” [Right Turn, 9/10]

Rubin now: “The communications team was the worst of any presidential campaign I have ever seen — slow and plodding, never able to capitalize on openings.”

Rubin then: “The Romney team, to a greater degree than most campaigns, has been criticized and lampooned. Too timid. Too unfocused. Too slow. Too inept. But this week demonstrated that the campaign officials are more skilled than they have been depicted, and their errors and stumbles have in large part been obliterated in the lingering glow of the convention. There is some personal vindication for them as well.” [Right Turn, 8/31]

Rubin now: “But if not for a stunning series of performances in the debates and unexpected eloquence on the stump in the last month, Romney almost surely would have done worse than he did. A presidential race needs more than a good month to be successful.”

Rubin then: “We’ve made the case that not only the first presidential debate but the debates as a whole recast the race and vaulted Mitt Romney into a position to win the race. Pollster Charlie Cook is the latest election guru to agree.” [Right Turn, 10/31]

OK, so we know that she is a lying sack of elephant poo, nothing to see here, move along… but the point of the matter is that she draws a paycheck, she gets a certain amount of credibility by being a WaPo columnist/blogger. There should be a moment of accountability for all of the so-called Public Intellectuals.

In my career, anyone who was that spectacularly, demonstrably wrong–documented every day, in fact–would be walked to the door. If His Willardness was a product launch and the Marketing Team (Rubin in this metaphor) had gotten it so completely wrong that the product imploded on launch, she would be in the unemployment line before lunch.

But here’s the thing: Rubin will be feted and rewarded. Her gig and the WaPo will continue and come 2016 her performance will continue to be a series of easily discernable and embarrassing lies and contempt completely unhinged and spewed, fire-hose style across the pages (real and digital) of one of the major newspapers of this country.

There is a Village, and we are not part of it, Scissorheads.

0 thoughts on “Jennifer Rubin then and now, now and then

  1. It’s almost as if Rabid Rubin was trying to do an Etch-A-Sketch of her record. Damn, where’d she ever pick up that trick? Honestly, I can’t stand listening to her. It’s like nails on a chalkboard and she never gets past canned GOP talking points aimed at third-grade intellects.

    Like

  2. Well, Pissed, her looks do leave me stunned. Almost enough to pine for Ann Coulter, but I’m interested in women.

    All those conservatards have a lot of ‘splainin’ to do after their predictions of a Willard landslide proved to be so wrong.

    Like

  3. I don’t think it is surprising at all that the right punditry is so shocked at the loss. Look, they have been Etch-A-sketching away any reality-basis for years now; going all the way back to the lung cancer/cigarette wars, buying pet labs to give the answers they want. Economics, history, climate change, evolution, now polling. All part of the liberal intelligentsis Thinkin’ Stuff, and if it conflicts with how ConservaWorld is supposed to be, IT MUST BE RONG LALALALALALALA I CAN’T HEAR YOU.

    We’ll need to take sharp objects and their car keys away if they get any more loosely connected to reality.

    Like

  4. Even Andrew Sullivan pointed out on Colbert that the epistemic bubble of the Village created the Willard Bubble. “Look! All the people I talk to are supporting Rmoney, so the polls must be wrong!”

    Luckily (for them, not for us) Village punditry is a game where being wrong never imperils your livelihood. Being a Liberal is a different story…

    Like

  5. Back in the 50s some NYC socialite was shocked when Ike was elected, or re-elected. “Nobody I know voted for him!”

    Kind of the same thing here.

    Like

Speak!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s